AI risk is now a line on the program risk register.
Tokto gives the aerospace risk and compliance officer one record that ties every prompt, every model output, every supplier-shared AI use, and every export-controlled data flow to a program, a contract, and a CUI category, ready for DCSA, the DoD CIO, State, the prime, and the board risk committee.
The board risk committee asks where AI sits on the program risk register. State has an ITAR enforcement open, DCSA has a parallel CMMC review, and the prime wants AI-control evidence before the next award. The risk officer has a heat map, a vendor file, and a clean assessment — none of it ties a model output to a contract, a CUI category, and the export-control posture in force.
- Every AI interaction scored and recorded against a program, a contract, a CUI category, a model version, and a foreign-person designation.
- A single evidence layer that DCSA, the DoD CIO, State, the prime, the insurer, and the board risk committee read against the same record.
- Policy enforced at the prompt: ITAR-controlled data, CUI, and foreign-person access blocked before tokens leave the boundary.
- AI risk that is measured, examinable, and attestable — not a red box on a heat map.
- AI never makes it onto the risk register. The first time it surfaces is a State ITAR enforcement.
- A CMMC examination asks for AI control evidence. The second line produces a policy memo, not a record. The finding stands.
- A supplier-shared model retains CUI past the contract. The exposure is discovered at the prime's audit, not on the register.
- The insurer asks how AI risk is controlled at renewal. There is no attestable answer. The premium reprices.
Tokto turns AI from an unmeasured exposure into a managed control. Every engineering co-pilot, every proposal model, every supplier-shared AI use becomes a scored record at the moment of output, tied to the program, the contract, the CUI category, the model version, and the policy in force. The first line gets the speed; the second line gets the control; the third line gets the evidence.
When DCSA examines CMMC controls, when State asks how ITAR-controlled data was governed, when the prime demands AI evidence at award, when the board risk committee asks where AI sits on the register, the answer is one query against the system of record. The risk officer reports AI exposure the way every other top risk is reported — with a number, a control, and a trail.