CEO & Board · Government

AI in public deliverables is now your auditor-general report.

Tokto gives the public-sector CEO or agency head one record that ties every AI tool, every prompt, every model output, and every vendor data flow to a procurement, a use case, and a constituent or student, ready for the auditor general, the legislature, and the press.

What keeps you up at night

A Title VI lawsuit lands on the AI detection tool. The DOJ files a seven-year consent decree on an AI pricing platform the agency uses. The auditor general opens a parallel review. The CEO is asked, in the same news cycle, why AI is in public deliverables without a record the public can read.

  • Every AI tool tied to a procurement, a vendor, a use case, a constituent or student, and a decision rule.
  • A complete record for the auditor general, FOIA, the procurement officer, the federal monitor, and the IG.
  • Policy applied at the prompt: no AI use in a public deliverable without verification, no proctoring or detection tool without bias testing.
  • Defensibility under Title VI complaint, public-records request, federal procurement audit, and IG review at once.
  • An AI proctoring tool produces a false positive. A Title VI complaint reaches federal court. The legislature opens hearings.
  • An AI vendor uses non-public competitor data to drive a public-dollar decision. DOJ consent decree and seven years of monitor.
  • A constituent-facing chatbot ships a fabricated citation. Partial refund and corrected report. Press cycle follows.
  • An AI deployment is in public use without bias testing on file. State AI procurement law and the inspector general both open.

Tokto sits across every AI deployment a public institution ships, with a CEO view that ties each AI tool to a procurement and a use case. Constituent-facing chatbots, AI detection tools, and pricing platforms all become records the legislature, the auditor general, and the press can read.

When the DOJ files a seven-year consent judgment, when a Title VI complaint reaches federal court, when an auditor general opens a review, the CEO answers each one out of one record. The institution stops reacting to FOIA-by-FOIA.